banner1
steebl
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit steebl's Xanga Site!

Name: Stephen
Birthday: 9/24/1987
Gender: Male


Interests: God, music, design, people, and the study thereof.
Occupation: Student


Message: message me
MSN: steeedwards@hotmail.com


Member Since: 6/26/2005

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Blogrings
~Loser~
previous - random - next

ChristRockers
previous - random - next

*`~OASIS~`*
previous - random - next

New Frontiers!
previous - random - next

Calvin and Hobbes!
previous - random - next

I <3 COLDPLAY
previous - random - next

Diepod
previous - random - next

Garlic bread???
previous - random - next


Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Wednesday, November 04, 2009

Currently
No Line On The Horizon
By U2
I'll go crazy if I don't go crazy tonight
see related

More thoughts on the L word

An overdue, non-cynical post (by request of the Schwessy).

If I had to sum up the main theological stuff that has really bowled me over this year, it all seems to come under the same category. 'The furious love of God'.

This is a funny development, in that on my own terms it's a theme I'm reluctant to linger on. I think (stupidly) to myself after a few weeks browsing, say, 1 John: “Right- surely, that's the theology of 'love' sorted, now onto other things... predestination, perhaps? Or a little something on the trinity?” Sometimes I feel like 'love' isn't 'heady' enough, and I want to get my teeth in to something more 'substantial' (again, a stupid line of thought- of course, love is the most substantial thing of all. God is love, love never fails, and all that glorious jazz!). There's even an element of stupid macho-residue, which subtly echoes, “Men don't devote time to pansy theological musings on 'love'! Real men focus on getting their heads around aggressive systematic understandings- apologetics and predestination, judgement and such!”

There's something within me that always tugs against over-thinking on fuzzy philosophical notions of 'the essence of agape'. I tug against being one of 'those' Christians, who answer every theological question with wishy-washy statements of, “yeah, well, God is love, so...”. Understandable, really, since words are cheap. When I was a kid I would watch top of the pops thinking, “All these stupid pop songs with 'love' in the title! It can't be all that special! Why are they so preoccupied with it?” Indeed, if love is nothing more than the stuff Paul McCartney sang about, then I would be a bit silly to be so preoccupied with it.

It only really struck me this week that it may just be that God wants me to be (wilfully or not) preoccupied with this theme for a while. As much as I try to branch out and meditate on different stuff, I keep getting yanked back towards the same little bundle of bible verses, which never cease to pierce me with the sheer weight of their implications. They pop up in songs, sermons, study, video presentations and conversations constantly. The vast majority of my own creative ideas are stemming out of them too. It's as though God is saying, “You may want to put a mental 'tick' by these verses as 'succesfully decoded', but I'm not done teaching you yet!”

1 Corinthians 13. 1 John 4:8. And, in particular, the following (omitted from my last post on the topic):

This is how we know what love is: Jesus Christ laid down his life for us. And we ought to lay down our lives for our brothers. If anyone has material possessions and sees his brother in need but has no pity on him, how can the love of God be in him? Dear children, let us not love with words or tongue but with actions and in truth. This then is how we know that we belong to the truth, and how we set our hearts at rest in his presence whenever our hearts condemn us. For God is greater than our hearts, and he knows everything. -1 John 3:16+

You see, at just the right time, when we were still powerless, Christ died for the ungodly. Very rarely will anyone die for a righteous man, though for a good man someone might possibly dare to die. But God demonstrates his own love for us in this: While we were still sinners, Christ died for us. -Romans 5:6-8

Greater love has no man than this, that he lay down his life for his friends. -John 5:13

This is love: not that we loved God, but that he loved us and sent his Son as an atoning sacrifice for our sins. -1 John 4:10

I'm reminded of a great quote by John Piper: 'You don't have to know a lot of things to do great things for the Lord. But you do have to know a few things, that are great, and be willing to live for them or die for them. … People that make a difference in the world are not people who have mastered a lot of things- they are people who have been mastered by a very few things that are very, very great.'

In more optimistic moments I think that there's a reason I can't seem to escape these verses. God is clearly intent on hammering them into me until they are second nature- truths that I breathe in constantly and that shape my conduct, rather than theological concepts that 'click' occasionally when I open my bible. After all, it would be a terrible tragedy for me to look back in a few years, at a decade of personal study, to find it was all proccupied with creating a neat 'filing cabinet' of theological ideas, at the expense of getting my hands dirty with actually sharing the gospel. The verses above, on the other hand, have been like a breath of fresh air; I can look at one of them in the morning and go into my day driven by the awesome mandate to 'love with actions and in truth', knowing that in doing so I may bring myself and others into closer communion with God. I know it's not the be-all end-all of theology, but it's a pretty fundamental part, and one i'm happy to linger on as long as necessary.

Here's my latest scribble on the theme:


Love didn't hide in himself
Love didn't shun a cruel world
Love didn't run, love never could
Love came to touch and transform

Love didn't look at himself
Love saw the need of all
Love gave away the riches He made
Squalor exchanged for the throne

And love becomes a beating heart
A broken back, A burden borne
Love dies to open eyes
And rises to restore


Friday, October 09, 2009

It's been a while...

So I thought I'd put up something creative! Here's a 'sermon jam' i've been working on. Not up to the same level of the ones online, but I like it... consists of a spliced up Ramsden preach over a bit of Einaudi piano.
Give it a listen! (Though be warned, it's over 7 minutes long!)

If I can get my brain in gear, a written blog will hopefully follow shortly. Tata!



Friday, September 11, 2009

Currently
We Shall Not Be Shaken
By Matt Redman
This is how we know
see related

Imagine

WARNING: This blog may contain (even more) lyrical social commentary .
I find it's a good way of condensing my thoughts on such things...

A few wiki-factoids about John Lennon's Imagine:
Rolling Stone Magazine ranked “Imagine” the 3rd greatest song of all time.
In 1999 BMI named "Imagine" one of the top 100 most-performed songs of the 20th century.
“In many countries around the world—my wife and I have visited about 125 countries—you hear John Lennon's song 'Imagine' used almost equally with national anthems”. -Jimmy Carter
It doesn't take a genius to see that this is a very popular song, representing a very popular idea! I wondered what the song would look like if the lyrics did justice to the less idyllic elements of Lennon's Utopia! Something like this?

Imagine there's no Heaven, It's easy if you try
No hell below us, Above us only sky
Imagine all the people, Living for today
Imagine there's no judgement, it's easier to bear
Nothing to be told off for, no knowing God to fear
Imagine one objective; pleasure for today

Imagine there's no countries, It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for, And no religion too
Imagine all the people, Living life in peace
Imagine all is matter, imagine no ideals
Nothing to take a stand for, and goodness arbitrary
Imagine all the people, doing as they please

Imagine no possessions, I wonder if you can
No need for greed or hunger, A brotherhood of man
Imagine all the people, Sharing all the world
Imagine no privation, where all is up to share
Where we require no fixing, and wealth's the only snare
Imagine every evil, structure could resolve

You may say that I'm a dreamer, But I'm not the only one
I hope someday you'll join us, And the world will be as one
You may say I'm a dreamer, but consensus comforts me
Let's have our cake- independence, and eat it too- unity

What say you? Number one material? Stay tuned- a little update of Europely things may follow soon.


Saturday, August 22, 2009

'Progress'

I saw an interesting interview with a controversial biologist on iPlayer recently. The man in question was attempting to create artificial life, and it was shocking how crudely he dismissed the concerns of his opponents. Here's a part of the interview:
Interviewer: So you're designing a genetic code on a computer and then making it in a laboratory? I'm sure some people will be very scared of that notion...
Biologist: Some people prefer to live in a cave and work with whale oil lamps, right?

What is the biologist really saying here? He doesn't so much answer the moral question as appeal to the rhetoric of 'progress'- a kind of binary distinction between 'progressive science' (modern construction, clean power) and the moral naysayers (fossil-fuel burning cavemen), without giving a sliver of credit to his opposition. Newton forbid that they could have anything legitimate to say! And so it comes down to the following logic- technological progress is inherently good. As long as we're cutting down on fossil fuels, extending life expectancy or pursuing an advance which could (conceivably) be used for such positive ends, then our methods and motives are legitimate. Any attempts to counter such progress can be easily swept aside as attempts to throw society back to the stone age. Contrast this appalling logic with that of Albert Einstein, who was not blind to the terrible potential of 'progress', even that with which he had played a significant role- I know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.
And as usual, it's the things that annoy me that tend to inspire lyrics!

You stand with giants now; you have a license to create
No time for mortals now, our archaic concerns
Am I a fool to doubt? Am I a caveman to believe
That hope and novelty are not the same thing?
Progress, you were programmed to deceive
Prestige, masquerading as concern
Trampling through the people you seduce
Ambition outshouts wisdom in this world
And on the side of you, every mouthpiece you have made
And you are skilled to shout the benefits of change
But labour-saving worlds have us labouring to pay
I wonder, when did you buy in to your own claims?
Progress, you were programmed to proceed
Greed, you fashion need from our desire
Confident to save us from the flames
But you're the one, you're the one, who starts the fire
You can build the vaccine, or engineer the plague
You can give it all for free, compel the world to pay
But progress, you were programmed to proceed
And you'll be the life or death of me


Tuesday, August 18, 2009

  



Next 5 >>